Categories
Portfolio Construction
Inflation’s hidden threat to portfolio construction
Wesley Phoa
Solutions Portfolio Manager
Steve Fox
Client Analytics Director
KEY TAKEAWAYS
  • Periods of high inflation can affect how different assets perform relative to one another
  • The design and management of multi-asset portfolios should account for the impact of inflation on asset class correlations
  • Existing analysis and simulation methods can be enhanced to more realistically account for inflation dynamics

Investors continue to contend with persistently high core inflation, a stark contrast to the era of low and steady inflation rates of recent decades. There are familiar headwinds, especially for portfolios focused on generating real income, as higher inflation eats away at the value of dividends and bond coupons and disrupts asset prices.


But our research highlights an additional threat from higher inflation, one that could result in higher-than-expected portfolio risk via a reduction of diversification benefits.


Inflation doesn’t just jeopardize a portfolio’s ability to generate real returns. It can undermine its ability to mitigate risk as well. Understanding this dynamic is particularly important to more risk-averse investors focused on income and downside protection, such as investors in and near retirement.


High-inflation environments impact how different assets perform relative to each other, as measured by the correlation between stocks and bonds. In normal low-inflation environments, asset returns are primarily affected by growth and flight-to-quality shocks, which have the opposite effect on the prices of stocks and Treasury bonds. But when inflation is high and volatile, inflation shocks dominate, and these can shift stock and bond prices in the same direction.


This behavior should be incorporated into multi-asset portfolio design and management and how practitioners measure the diversification benefits these portfolios offer, especially for those nearing and in retirement.


Inflation dynamics show that the inflation rate follows persistent long-term trends, with considerable volatility over the short term. Moreover, asset class returns and inflation jointly exhibit persistent regimes, where both the average rate of inflation and the correlation among asset class returns shift together.


Asset correlations are a key input into portfolio construction. Therefore, in constructing portfolios with inflation risk in mind — and understanding how they may respond to changes in the long-term inflation regime — it is important to take these dynamics into account, for example when running Monte Carlo simulations.1


A line chart depicts the seasonally adjusted year-over-year percent change in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers, including all items less food and energy in U.S. city average on a monthly basis from the data series’ inception in January 1958 through June 2023. Periods of economic recession are indicated on chart via dark blue vertical shading corresponding to the periods of April 1961 through February 1961, December 1969 through November 1970, November 1973 through March 1975, January 1980 through July 1980. July 1981 through November 1982, July 1990 through March 1991, March 2001 through November 2001, December 2007 through June 2009, and February 2020 through June 2020. From a starting point of 2.8% in January 1958, the year-over-year percent change initially declines through June 1966, before spiking to highs of 11.9% in February 1975 and 13.6% in June 1980. From there, the inflation rate broadly declines through early 2021 and then rapidly increases through the remainder of the year and much of 2022, ending at 4.9% in June 2023.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics. Shaded dark blue vertical bars represent periods of economic recession.

Based on observed historical data, a simple rule of thumb can connect the inflation trend to the stock-bond correlation regime: When medium-term trend inflation rises above 4% (as it did in 2022), stock-bond correlations tend to turn positive; when trend inflation falls below 2.5%, correlations tend to revert to negative.2


Another difficulty with sampling asset returns from static capital market assumptions is related to returns on cash. Cash yields tend to be higher in a high-inflation regime and lower in a low-inflation regime.3 Portfolio analysis and simulation should reflect this.


Multi-asset portfolios constructed and managed using static correlation assumptions may not be properly structured given these findings.4 This can result in suboptimal allocations that may not achieve desired portfolio objectives. 


Practitioners should seek to develop a joint model of asset class returns, inflation, cash yields and correlation regimes. The integration needs to account for several key features:

  • Monte Carlo simulations should explicitly incorporate inflation. Along each path, the rate of inflation should evolve dynamically and be appropriately linked to asset returns (e.g., when inflation rises, bonds do poorly).
  • The inflation rate and the yield on cash should be modeled as random walks, rather than as white noise as is done for other asset classes.5
  • Simulations should allow for regime-switching behavior.
  • Expected asset class returns and correlations should be appropriate for the inflation regime being modeled. This can be achieved by formulating regime-specific capital market assumptions.

These features can be retrofitted onto an existing simulation engine to help it realistically account for how inflation may impact asset classes. Incorporating realistic inflation dynamics leads to changes in insights regarding both asset allocations and the potential distribution of outcomes. The approach presented here is already proving useful in the management of our multi-asset solutions.


Learn more about Capital Group’s approach to inflation risk in our white paper “How our Target Date Series manages inflation risk.”



Wesley Phoa is a solutions portfolio manager with 30 years of industry experience (as of 12/31/2023). He holds a PhD in pure mathematics from Trinity College at the University of Cambridge and a bachelor’s degree with honors from the Australian National University.

Steve Fox is a client analytics director with 29 years of industry experience (as of 12/31/2023). He holds a PhD in economics from the University of California, Santa Barbara and a bachelor’s degree in economics and mathematics from the University of California, Davis.


1 Monte Carlo simulation is a mathematical technique that generates random numbers to estimate the range of possible outcomes for an uncertain event.

2 For details on all aspects of the modeling approaches, refer to Phoa, Wesley K., “Strategic Asset Allocation and Inflation Resilience,” Journal of Portfolio Management, March 2023.

3 Cash yield refers to the income generated by an investment (i.e., interest, bond coupons or stock dividends), which excludes capital appreciation.

4 A static correlation assumption applies a single estimate of asset class correlations across a long-term horizon.

5 A random walk represents changes in a variable that follow no discernable trend. White noise refers to variations in data that do not exhibit causal relationships with any other variables.    

 

Never miss an insight

The Capital Ideas newsletter delivers weekly insights straight to your inbox.

Investments are not FDIC-insured, nor are they deposits of or guaranteed by a bank or any other entity, so they may lose value.
Investors should carefully consider investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses. This and other important information is contained in the fund prospectuses and summary prospectuses, which can be obtained from a financial professional and should be read carefully before investing.
Although the target date portfolios are managed for investors on a projected retirement date time frame, the allocation strategy does not guarantee that investors' retirement goals will be met. Investment professionals manage the portfolio, moving it from a more growth-oriented strategy to a more income-oriented focus as the target date gets closer. The target date is the year that corresponds roughly to the year in which an investor is assumed to retire and begin taking withdrawals. Investment professionals continue to manage each portfolio for approximately 30 years after it reaches its target date.
Statements attributed to an individual represent the opinions of that individual as of the date published and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Capital Group or its affiliates. This information is intended to highlight issues and should not be considered advice, an endorsement or a recommendation.
All Capital Group trademarks mentioned are owned by The Capital Group Companies, Inc., an affiliated company or fund. All other company and product names mentioned are the property of their respective companies.
Use of this website is intended for U.S. residents only.
Capital Client Group, Inc.
This content, developed by Capital Group, home of American Funds, should not be used as a primary basis for investment decisions and is not intended to serve as impartial investment or fiduciary advice.