Capital IdeasTM

Investment insights from Capital Group

Categories
U.S. Equities
Three investment ideas from second quarter earnings
Mark L. Casey
Equity Portfolio Manager
Christopher Lee
Equity Investment Analyst
Betsy Lind
Equity Investment Analyst

A spike in volatility following a lackluster jobs report in the United States and a rate hike in Japan masked a broadly solid second quarter earnings season.


“I’m a long-term investor, but the long term is the sum of all the short terms so every quarterly earnings report matters,” says Mark Casey, equity portfolio manager. “I’m interested in evidence that my long-term thesis is going as expected, better than expected, or possibly worse than expected.”


With that in mind, here are three investment ideas from the latest round of earnings reports.


Earnings outlook softens for 2024, but remains solid


The bar chart above represents earnings estimates for the second quarter of 2024, 2024, and 2025. The first estimate is prior to second-quarter earnings released, or 30 June 2024, and the second estimate is the current estimate, as of 14 August 2024, after most S&P 500 Index companies released second-quarter earnings. For second-quarter 2024 prior estimates it was 8.1% year-over-year earnings growth versus current estimates of 10.9%. For 2024 calendar year prior estimates it was 10.8% year-over-year earnings growth versus revised estimates of 10.1%. For 2025 calendar year prior estimates it was 14.3% year-over-year earnings growth versus revised estimates of 15.1%.

Sources: Capital Group, FactSet. Earnings growth refers to annual change in earnings per share. As of 14 August 2024.

1. AI is generating value, but spending is a concern


Executives at large technology companies emphasised during their earnings calls how investments in artificial intelligence have already contributed to business growth. These statements may have been made to address investor concerns about increased capital expenditure to support AI.


“Every AI-driven company seems to have a good story about how AI is showing some positive impact to revenue, which is one reason their stocks aren’t too far off from their all-time highs,” Casey says.


Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg noted that “advances in AI continue to improve the quality of recommendations and drive engagement.” One of the company’s long-term goals is to provide marketers the ability to automate the processes of creating and testing advertising content.


Still, investors are nervous about increased spending. “In some cases, the check sizes are getting so large it’s hard to imagine the investment return can be there,” Casey says.


If a recession hits, lower spending from customers could crimp profits, but the impacts to long-term stock prices are harder to predict.


“My simplifying approach to investing is to think four to eight years out and assume there is a recession between now and then. Then I try to determine which companies are likely to be larger and more profitable at that point in the future than their stock prices currently assume,” Casey says. The exercise helps him work through near-term volatility and avoid rash decisions.


2. Companies with weight loss drugs widen their lead


The duopoly for weight loss and diabetes drugs from Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk is likely to continue for some time, says equity analyst Christopher Lee, who covers US pharmaceuticals and biotechnology companies.


Eli Lilly, which sells Mounjaro and Zepbound, aggressively invested in manufacturing capacity as high demand landed those products on the Food and Drug Administration’s shortage list. In early August, the government’s database indicated they are now available.


“Competitors are coming around to the idea that they need to have a product that differs from or is complementary to obesity drugs currently on the market,” Lee says. For example, some companies are working on drugs that will preserve muscle mass as people lose weight.


The moat has widened because Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk, maker of Ozempic and Wegovy, have invested billions into their franchises over the past 20 years. “By the time a competitor has a product, Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk will have built a strong wall with commercial insurers. Often referred to as a rebate wall, the practice makes it difficult for competitors to gain traction for their drugs,” Lee notes.


Meanwhile, investors concerned about a slowdown in the economy could take the opportunity to review their health care exposure overall, Lee adds. The sector has tended to hold up well compared to the S&P 500 in a downturn as opting out of life-saving medication is usually not a choice for most consumers.


Health care stocks have recently held up


A line chart represents the cumulative return of the S&P 500 Index compared to the S&P 500 Health Care sector from 31 May to 14 August 2024, indexed to 100 as of 31 May 2024. Results for the S&P 500 Index rose through 16 July 2024, to 107.6. Results for the S&P 500 Health Care sector rose to 102.8 on 24 Junebefore falling to 100.2 on 3 July. Results for both rose in the first half of July before falling to lows in early August. As of 14 August 2024, the S&P 500 Index stood at 103.6 while the S&P 500 HealthCare sector stood at 106.2.

Sources: Capital Group, FactSet, Standard & Poor's. Cumulative total return figures are indexed to 100 as of May 31, 2024, and current through August 14, 2024.

3. America still runs on fast food


After raising prices considerably in the wake of the pandemic, McDonald’s and other fast-food companies are offering more affordable options to win back unhappy customers, says equity investment analyst Betsy Lind.


“McDonald’s has traditionally done well in an environment where consumers pull back on spending, but it pushed its pricing so much higher over the last few years that it lost traffic among lower income consumers,” Lind says.


Fast-food companies are now launching national value meals and actively competing for customers. “They can’t raise prices, so they need to grow volume.”


Meanwhile, growth continues for restaurant and food delivery companies such as DoorDash, in part because they have expanded their services to include grocery deliveries. Inflation for food sold in grocery stores has declined faster than restaurant inflation, Lind notes, adding that the gap is expected to narrow.


Consumers dined at home as restaurant inflation remains high


The line chart shows the cumulative change in restaurant price inflation and grocery price inflation. A shaded region from February 2020 to March 2020 indicates a recessionary period. The vertical axis indicates the cumulative percentage change in CPI, ranging from 0% to 35%. From December 2018 to December 2019, restaurant inflation rose 3% while grocery inflation rose 1%. From December 2018 to December 2022, restaurant inflation rose 23% while grocery inflation rose 25%. From December 2018 to July 2024, restaurant inflation rose a total 32% while grocery inflation rose to 28%.

Sources: Capital Group, Bureau of Labor Statistics, National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER). Shaded region indicates period defined as a recessionary period by the NBER. Cumulative change shown is for the US Consumer Price Index (CPI) for All Urban Consumers: Food At Home (groceries) and U.S. CPI for All Urban Consumers: Food Away From Home (restaurants) between December 2018 and July 2024.

Lind thinks McDonald’s could regain customers because the company’s speed of service and uncomplicated menu haven’t changed. McDonald’s same store sales in the U.S. declined 0.7% in the second quarter compared to last year. The company’s stock has declined roughly 7.5% this year as of 15 August.


In contrast, companies like Sweetgreen, Chipotle and Cava Group that cater to higher income, health-conscious consumers continue to show strong growth. “There is a long-term theme of people shifting to these options, but they’re not the reason fast-food companies are hurting,” Lind says.


Surviving a selloff


Recent market volatility showed how impulsive investors can be as concerns of a looming recession took hold. And just as quickly, equity markets staged a comeback. Overall, quarterly earnings have generally been strong, with some signs that lower income consumers continue to moderate their spending.


Markets will likely continue to have bouts of volatility in the short term as sentiment shifts and markets move on emotions. “In the long term, however, a company’s stock price tends to accurately reflect what the company is economically worth,” Casey concludes.



Mark L. Casey is an equity portfolio manager with 23 years of investment industry experience (as of 12/31/2023). He holds an MBA from Harvard and a bachelor’s degree in history from Yale.

Christopher Lee is an equity investment analyst with research responsibility for U.S. pharmaceuticals and biotechnology. He has 16 years of investment industry experience (as of 12/31/2023). He holds a medical degree from Columbia University and a bachelor's degree in molecular biophysics and biochemistry from Yale.

Betsy Lind is an equity investment analyst with research responsibility for U.S. restaurants, food tech and food distributors. She has 21 years of investment industry experience (as of 12/31/2023). She holds an MBA from Stanford and a bachelor's degree in business administration from the University of Southern California.


Hear from our investment team.

Sign up now to get industry-leading insights and timely articles delivered to your inbox.

By providing your details you are agreeing to receive emails from Capital Group. All emails include an unsubscribe link and you may opt out at any time. For more information, please read the Capital Group Privacy Policy

Past results are not a guarantee of future results. The value of investments and income from them can go down as well as up and you may lose some or all of your initial investment. This information is not intended to provide investment, tax or other advice, or to be a solicitation to buy or sell any securities.

Statements attributed to an individual represent the opinions of that individual as of the date published and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Capital Group or its affiliates. All information is as at the date indicated unless otherwise stated. Some information may have been obtained from third parties, and as such the reliability of that information is not guaranteed.

Capital Group manages equity assets through three investment groups. These groups make investment and proxy voting decisions independently. Fixed income investment professionals provide fixed income research and investment management across the Capital organization; however, for securities with equity characteristics, they act solely on behalf of one of the three equity investment groups.