Risques

Informations en matière de durabilité

Synthèse

Sans objectif d’investissement durable

Ce Fonds promeut des caractéristiques environnementales ou sociales, mais n’a pas pour objectif l’investissement durable. Toutefois, CRMC (le « Conseiller en investissement ») s’engage à conserver au moins 5 % des investissements du Fonds dans des sociétés qui, selon lui, relèvent des défis sociaux et/ou environnementaux par le biais de ses produits et/ou services actuels ou futurs.

Caractéristiques environnementales ou sociales des produits financiers

Le Fonds promeut les caractéristiques environnementales ou sociales en excluant de ses investissements des émetteurs non alignés sur les critères d’exclusion en vigueur.

Stratégie d’investissement

Le Conseiller en investissement identifie certains émetteurs ou groupes d’émetteurs qu’il exclut du portefeuille afin de promouvoir les caractéristiques environnementales ou sociales soutenues par le Fonds. Le Conseiller en investissement évalue et applique des filtres ESG et normatifs pour mettre en œuvre des exclusions sur les émetteurs privés et souverains à l’égard de certains secteurs tels que le tabac, les combustibles fossiles, les armes, ainsi que les entreprises qui enfreignent les principes du Pacte mondial des Nations unies (la « Politique de filtrage négatif »).

Le Fonds promeut, entre autres caractéristiques, des caractéristiques environnementales et sociales, à condition que les entreprises dans lesquelles les investissements sont réalisés suivent de bonnes pratiques de gouvernance. Les pratiques de bonne gouvernance sont évaluées dans le cadre du processus d’intégration ESG du Conseiller en investissement. Dans le cadre de l’évaluation des pratiques de bonne gouvernance, le Conseiller en investissement tient compte au minimum des éléments qu’il estime pertinents pour les quatre piliers prescrits de la bonne gouvernance (à savoir les structures de gestion, les relations avec les employés, la rémunération du personnel et la conformité fiscale). Ces pratiques sont évaluées dans le cadre d’un processus de suivi. Le cas échéant, une analyse fondamentale d’une série d’indicateurs de gouvernance qui abordent des domaines tels que les pratiques d’audit, la composition du conseil d’administration et la rémunération des dirigeants, entre autres, est également réalisée.

La Politique de filtrage négatif de Capital Group s’appliquera à l’ensemble du portefeuille, à l’exception des liquidités, des équivalents de liquidités et des fonds du marché monétaire. Les dérivés sur indices utilisés à des fins de couverture et/ou d’investissement ne seront pas évalués en toute transparence. Par conséquent, dans certaines circonstances, le Fonds peut obtenir une exposition indirecte à un émetteur appartenant aux catégories exclues (par le biais, notamment, de produits dérivés et d’instruments qui permettent une exposition à un indice). Les produits dérivés à dénomination unique devront être conformes à la Politique de filtrage négatif. Le Conseiller en investissement s’assurera que les garanties obtenues sont conformes à la politique.

Proportion d’investissements

L’allocation d’actifs prévue fait l’objet d’un suivi continu et d’une évaluation annuelle. Au moins 90 % des investissements du Fonds sont alignés sur les caractéristiques E/S. Au maximum 10 % des investissements du Fonds, qui incluent les investissements non alignés sur les caractéristiques E/S et/ou les produits dérivés, se trouvent dans la catégorie « #2 Autres ». Sur les 90 %, le Fonds comptera au minimum 5 % d’investissements durables dans son portefeuille à finalité environnementale ou sociale dans des activités économiques qui ne sont pas considérées comme durables sur le plan environnemental au sens de la Taxonomie européenne.

Contrôle des caractéristiques environnementales ou sociales

Le Conseiller en investissement applique des exclusions ESG et normatives afin d’assurer la mise en œuvre d’une Politique de filtrage négatif aux investissements du Fonds. Le Fonds contrôlera :

• si les émetteurs privés respectent les critères stipulés dans la Politique de filtrage négatif ; et
• le pourcentage d’émetteurs souverains ne relevant pas du processus d’évaluation des souverains du Conseiller en investissement.

Méthodes

Le Fonds met en œuvre un critère ESG contraignant : des filtres sectoriels et normatifs qui se traduisent par des exclusions.

Sources et traitement des données

Les exclusions sont principalement définies suite aux recherches de filtrage de l’implication ESG des entreprises de MSCI (« ESG de MSCI ») d’un fournisseur tiers. D’autres données intègrent la liste MSCI des émetteurs en violation du Pacte mondial des Nations unies.

Limites aux méthodes et aux données

La méthodologie et les sources relatives aux exclusions et à l’approche de l’intégration ESG dans leur ensemble présentent certaines limites.

Diligence raisonnable

Les membres des services de conformité réglementaire, de gestion du risque et d’audit interne de Capital Group réalisent des évaluations périodiques de la conception et de l’efficacité opérationnelle des activités ESG et des principaux contrôles de l’entreprise.

Politiques d’engagement

La mise en place d’un dialogue avec les sociétés fait partie intégrante du service de gestion des investissements que le Conseiller en investissement assure pour ses clients. Cela permet à Capital Group de mener un dialogue collaboratif sur toute question susceptible d’affecter les perspectives à long terme de l’entreprise en portefeuille, y compris ses expositions aux thématiques de durabilité.

Indice de référence désigné

Le Fonds n’a désigné aucun indice de référence en vue d’atteindre les caractéristiques environnementales et/ou sociales qu’il promeut.

The sustainability-related disclosures are meant to be revised as necessary from time to time to capture any changes or reviews. The capitalized terms are used in accordance with the definitions and references outlined in Capital International Fund Prospectus.

Capital International Fund – Capital Group Euro Bond Fund (LUX) (the “Fund”)

LEI: 549300MSGNIE4SEG2P53

The below section “Summary” was prepared in English and is being translated to other official languages of the European Economic Area. In case of any inconsistency(ies) or conflict(s) between the different versions of this section “Summary”, the English language version shall prevail.

Summary

No sustainable investment objective

This Fund promotes environmental or social characteristics, but does not have as its objective sustainable investment. However, CRMC (the “Investment Adviser”) commits to maintain at least 5% of the Fund’s investments in companies that, in the Investment Adviser’s opinion, are addressing social and/or environmental challenges through their current or future products and/or services.

Environmental or social characteristics of the financial products

The Fund promotes the environmental or social characteristics of excluding investments in issuers that do not align with the exclusion criteria in place.

Investment strategy

The Investment Adviser identifies certain issuers or groups of issuers that it excludes from the portfolio to promote the environmental or social characteristics supported by the Fund. The Investment Adviser evaluates and applies ESG and norms-based screening to implement exclusions on corporate and sovereign issuers with respect to certain sectors such as tobacco, fossil fuel and weapons, as well as companies violating the United Nations Global Compact principles (the “Negative Screening Policy”).

The Fund promotes, among other characteristics, environmental and social characteristics, provided that the companies in which investments are made follow good governance practices. Good governance practices are evaluated as part of the Investment Adviser’s ESG integration process. When assessing good governance practices, the Investment Adviser will, as a minimum, have regard to matters it sees relevant to the four prescribed pillars of good governance (i.e., sound management structures, employee relations, remuneration of staff and tax compliance). Such practices are assessed through a monitoring process. Where relevant, fundamental analysis of a range of governance metrics that cover areas such as auditing practices, board composition and executive compensation, among others, is also conducted.

The Capital Group’s Negative Screening Policy will apply to the entire portfolio, with the exception of cash, cash equivalents and money market funds. Index derivatives that are used for hedging and/or investment purposes will not be assessed on a look–through basis. Therefore, there may be circumstances where the Fund may gain indirect exposure to an issuer involved in the excluded categories (through, including but not limited to, derivatives and instrument that gives exposure to an index). Single-name derivatives will need to be compliant with the Negative Screening Policy. The Investment Adviser will ensure that collateral received is aligned with the policy.

Proportion of investments

The planned asset allocation is monitored continuously and evaluated on a yearly basis. At least 90% of the Fund's investments are aligned with E/S characteristics. A maximum of 10% of the Fund’s investments including investments non-aligned with the E/S characteristics promoted and/or derivatives are in category “#2 Other”. Within the 90%, the Fund will have a minimum proportion of 5% of the portfolio in sustainable investments with an environmental or social objective in economic activities that do not qualify as environmentally sustainable under the EU Taxonomy.

Monitoring of environmental or social characteristics

The Investment Adviser applies ESG and norms-based exclusions to implement a Negative Screening Policy to the Fund’s investments. The Fund will monitor:

• adherence of corporate issuers to the criteria set forth in the Negative Screening Policy; and

• percentage of sovereign issuers failing the Investment Adviser’s process for assessing sovereigns.

Methodologies

The Fund implements one binding ESG-related criteria: sector- and norms-based screens in the form of exclusions.

Data sources and processing

Exclusions are primarily identified through a third-party provider, MSCI ESG Business Involvement Screening Research (“MSCI ESG”). Other data points include the MSCI United Nations Global Compact violators.

Limitations to methodologies and data

The methodology and sources relating to the exclusions and the ESG integration approach as a whole have certain limitations.

Due diligence

Members of Capital Group's compliance, risk management and internal audit staff conduct periodic assessments on the design and operating effectiveness of the firm’s ESG activities and key controls.

Engagement policies

Establishing dialogue with companies is an integral part of the Investment Adviser’s investment management service to clients. This enables Capital Group to engage and generate dialogue on any issues that could affect the investee company’s long-term prospects, including exposures to sustainability issues.

Designated reference benchmark

The Fund has not designated a reference benchmark to meet the environmental and/or social characteristics it promotes.

No sustainable investment objective

This Fund promotes environmental or social characteristics but does not have as its objective sustainable investment.

However, the Investment Adviser commits to maintain at least 5% of the Fund’s investments in companies that, in the Investment Adviser’s opinion, are addressing social and/or environmental challenges through their current or future products and/or services. This 5% minimum qualifies as “sustainable investments” under Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 on sustainability-related disclosures in the financial services sector.

Such companies have products and services that are majority-aligned, or transitioning towards higher positive alignment, with any single or combination of sustainable investment themes focused on global social and environmental challenges as identified by the Investment Adviser. These themes map to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (“SDGs”). Therefore, investments could be made in companies addressing needs such as but not limited to: (i) energy transition, (ii) health & well-being, (iii) sustainable cities & communities, (iv) responsible consumption, (v) clean water & sanitation, (vi) education & information access, and (vii) financial inclusion.

The sustainable investments that the Fund intends to make are subject to the Investment Adviser’s eligibility process for sustainable investments. Sustainable investments are those whose business activities are majority-aligned or transitioning towards higher positive alignment with any one or a combination of these sustainable investment themes, and that (i) do not significant harm any environmental or social objective (ii) follow good governance practices and (iii) satisfy the Negative Screening Policy.

The sustainable investments that the Fund partially intends to make shall not cause any significant harm to any environmental or social sustainable investment objectives. As such the Investment Adviser considers the mandatory Principle Adverse Impacts (PAIs) as set out in Table 1 of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 for corporate investments, as well as other ESG risks and controversies that the Investment Adviser considers potentially material, such as data privacy or censorship issues. Companies deemed by the Investment Adviser to be causing significant harm, based on the PAIs, are not considered sustainable investments. No investment in sovereign issuers will be considered as sustainable.

How have the indicators for adverse impacts on sustainability factors been taken into account?

As mentioned above, the Investment Adviser considers all mandatory PAIs.

The Investment Adviser considers several PAIs within its Negative Screening Policy. In particular, the Negative Screening Policy addresses the Principal Adverse Impact 4 on exposure to companies active in the fossil fuel sector, Principal Adverse Impact 10 on United Nations Global Compact violators and Principal Adverse Impact 14 on controversial weapons.

Beyond the screening process, with respect to the remaining mandatory PAIs:

1. where the Investment Adviser considers sufficient and reliable quantitative data is available across the investment universe, the Investment Adviser uses third-party data and prescribed thresholds to determine whether the adverse impact associated with the company’s activities is potentially significant based on the company’s relative ranking (on the specific adverse impact) to the overall investment universe and/or peer group; or

2. where data availability or quality is not sufficient across the investment universe to enable a quantitative analysis, the Investment Adviser assess significant harm on a qualitative basis, for example using proxies. 

The Investment Adviser’s assessment will also include an overall qualitative assessment of how ESG risks are being managed.

Where third party data or the Investment Adviser’s assessment indicates that a company is potentially doing significant harm based on a PAI threshold, the Investment Adviser will do additional due diligence to better understand and assess negative impacts indicated by third party or proprietary data. If the Investment Adviser concludes that the company is not causing significant harm based on its analysis, it may proceed with the investment and the rationale for that decision will then be documented. For example, the Investment Adviser may conclude a company is not causing significant harm if (i) the Investment Adviser has reason to believe that third-party data is inaccurate and the Investment Adviser’s own research demonstrates that the company is not causing significant harm; or (ii) the company is taking steps to mitigate or remediate that harm through the adoption of timebound targets and there are meaningful signs of improvement and positive change.

How are the sustainable investments aligned with the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights? Details:

The sustainable investments are aligned with the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights as follows: the Investment Adviser reviews issuers involved in significant ESG controversies, with a focus on those that may conflict with existing global standards, including guidelines from the United Nations Global. In accordance with the Negative Screening Policy applied to the Fund, the Investment Adviser will exclude companies violating the UN Global Compact principles. Although other incidents will not automatically result in exclusion from the Fund, the Investment Adviser ensures that appropriate action to remediate the concerns are taken.

Environmental or social characteristics of the financial product

The Fund promotes environmental and social characteristics, provided that the companies in which investments are made follow good governance practices.
The Investment Adviser evaluates and applies ESG and norms-based exclusions to implement a Negative Screening Policy to the Fund’s investments at the time of purchase.

For corporate issuers, the Investment Adviser relies on third-party providers who identify an issuer’s participation in or the revenue which they derive from activities that are inconsistent with these screens with respect to certain sectors such as tobacco, fossil fuel and weapons, as well as companies violating the principles of the United Nations Global Compact (UNGC).

For sovereign issuers, the Investment Adviser conducts an eligibility assessment leveraging its proprietary sovereign ESG framework, which covers a range of ESG indicators to evaluate how well a country manages its ESG risk. The Investment Adviser uses its proprietary sovereign ESG framework to assess the ESG score of a sovereign issuer against predetermined thresholds.

The Investment Adviser selects investments to the extent they are in line with the negative screening policy.

Investment strategy

The Investment Adviser applies the following investment strategy to attain the environmental and/or social characteristics promoted.

Negative Screening Policy: The Investment Adviser evaluates and applies ESG and norms-based exclusions to implement a Negative Screening Policy to the Fund’s investments at the time of purchase.

To support this screening on corporate issuers, the Investment Adviser relies on third party provider(s) who identify an issuer’s participation in or the revenue which they derive from activities that are inconsistent with the ESG and norms-based screens. In this way, third party provider data is used to support the application of ESG and norms-based screening by the Investment Adviser. In the event that exclusions cannot be verified through third-party providers or if the Investment Adviser believes that data and/or assessment is incomplete or inaccurate, the Investment Adviser reserves the right to identify business involvement activities through its own assessment (including by using other third-party data sources). If an eligible corporate issuer held in a Fund subsequently fails a screen, the issuer will not contribute towards the environmental and/or social characteristics of the Fund and will generally be sold within six months from the date of such determination, subject to the best interests of investors in the Fund.

For sovereign issuers, the Investment Adviser conducts an eligibility assessment leveraging its proprietary sovereign ESG framework, which covers a range of ESG indicators to evaluate how well a country manages its ESG risk. To be eligible for investment, sovereigns must score above pre-determined thresholds for their proprietary ESG score on both an absolute and GNI-adjusted basis. The Investment Adviser leverages data from third-party institutions such as the United Nations and the World Bank to calculate ESG scores across the sovereign universe. Sovereign issuers are evaluated on: (1) a gross national income-adjusted basis to better understand how well a country manages ESG risk relative to its wealth and available resources, as well as (2) on an absolute basis. Sovereign issuers that score below pre-defined thresholds in either category are generally not eligible for purchase by the Funds. If the Investment Adviser believes that the third-party data and/or assessment is incomplete or inaccurate, the Investment Adviser reserves the right to identify exclusions for sovereign issuers through its own assessment. The Investment Adviser also periodically reviews sovereign issuers and if a previously eligible sovereign issuer held in the Fund becomes ineligible, the sovereign issuer will not contribute towards the environmental and/or social characteristics of the Fund and the sovereign issuer will generally be sold within six months from the date of such determination, subject to the best interests of investors in the Fund (save that if the Investment Adviser believes that a score is below a pre-defined threshold for a temporary or a transitory reason, the Investment Adviser may, from time to time, exercise its discretion to keep holding or purchase securities issued by the sovereign issuer).

What is the policy to assess good governance practices of the investee companies?

The Investment Adviser ensures that the companies in which investments are made follow good governance practices.

When assessing good governance practices, the Investment Adviser will, as a minimum, have regard to matters it sees relevant to the four prescribed pillars of good governance (i.e., sound management structures, employee relations, remuneration of staff and tax compliance). 

As described above, the Investment Adviser applies a Negative Screening Policy to the Fund. As part of this, the Investment Adviser excludes companies that, based on available third-party data, are viewed to be in violation of the principles of the UNGC, which include Principle 10 (anti-corruption) and Principle 3 (employee relations).

In addition, good governance practices are evaluated as part of the Investment Adviser’s ESG integration process. Such practices are assessed through a monitoring process based on available third-party indicators relating to corporate governance and corporate behavior. Third-party data may be inaccurate, incomplete or outdated. Where the corporate governance and corporate behavior indicators cannot be verified through the third-party provider, the Investment Adviser will aim to make such determination through its own assessment based on information that is reasonably available. Where relevant, fundamental analysis of a range of metrics that cover auditing practices, board composition, and executive compensation, among others, is also conducted. The Investment Adviser also engages in regular dialogue with companies on corporate governance issues and exercises its proxy voting rights for the entities in which the Fund invests.
If a previously eligible company held in a Fund subsequently fails the Investment Adviser’s assessment of good governance practices, the company will generally be sold within six months from the date of such determination, subject to the best interests of investors in the Fund.

Capital Group's ESG Policy Statement provides additional detail on Capital Group’s ESG philosophy, integration, governance, support, and processes, including proxy voting procedures and principles, as well as views on specific ESG issues, including ethical conduct, disclosures and corporate governance. Information on Capital Group’s corporate governance principles can be found in its Proxy Voting Procedures and Principles as well as in the ESG Policy Statement.

Information on Capital Group’s corporate governance principles can be also found in its Proxy Voting Procedures and Principles, available on:
https://www.capitalgroup.com/content/dam/cgc/tenants/europe/documents/responsible-investing/global_proxy_voting_guidelines(en).pdf.
The ESG Policy Statement provides additional detail on Capital Group’s views on specific ESG issues, including ethical conduct, disclosures and corporate governance, available on: http://www.capitalgroup.com/content/dam/cgc/tenants/eacg/esg/files/esg-policy-statement(en).pdf

Proportion of investments

At least 90% of the Fund's investments are in category “#1 Aligned with E/S characteristics” and so are used to attain the environmental or social characteristics promoted by the Fund (being subject to the Investment Adviser’s binding Negative Screening Policy and carbon constraint). A maximum of 10% of the Fund’s investments including investments non-aligned with the E/S characteristics promoted and/or derivatives are in category “#2 Other”.

Within the 90%, the Fund will have a minimum proportion of 5% of the portfolio in sub-category “#1A Sustainable”, being sustainable investments with an environmental or social objective in economic activities that do not qualify as environmentally sustainable under the EU Taxonomy. These are investments that have passed through the Investment Adviser’s sustainable investment assessment. The remainder of the portfolio will be in category “#1B Other E/S characteristics”, being companies that do not pass the Investment Adviser’s assessment of sustainable investment.

Cash and/or cash equivalents are excluded from the asset allocation above. Cash and cash-equivalents may be held for liquidity purposes to support the Fund’s overall investment objective.

Monitoring of environmental or social characteristics

The sustainability indicators used by this Fund to measure the attainment of each of the environmental or social characteristics it promotes are as follows.

The Investment Adviser applies ESG and norms-based exclusions to implement a Negative Screening Policy to the Fund’s investments. The Fund will monitor:

• percentage of corporate issuers failing a screen under the Negative Screening Policy; and

• percentage of sovereign issuers failing the Investment Adviser’s process for assessing sovereigns.

The Fund applies investment restrictions rules at the time of purchase on a pre-trade basis in portfolio management systems to restrain investment in companies or issuers based on the exclusion criteria. The portfolio also undergoes regular/systematic post-trade compliance checks.
The methodology applied to sovereign and corporate issuers respectively in support of this screening is described in detail under the section “Investment Strategy” of this document.
In the event that exclusions cannot be verified through the third-party provider(s) or if the Investment Adviser believes that third party data and/or assessment is incomplete or inaccurate, the Investment Adviser will aim to identify business involvement activities through its own assessment (including third-party data sources). Please refer to Fund’s Negative Screening Policy for further details.

Methodologies

In addition to the sustainable investment commitments described above, the Fund implements one binding ESG-related criteria: sector- and norms-based screens in the form of exclusions, with the methodology applied to this commitment having already been presented in detail in the previous sections.
The SFDR classification is related to the European Union’s regulation and is not equivalent to approval or recognition as an ESG Fund by regulators in Asia Pacific.

Data sources and processing

The Investment Adviser uses a combination of internal research and third-party data providers to gather ESG-related data.
Third-party providers are used to calculate the carbon footprint of the Fund and for identifying corporate issuers' involvement in activities inconsistent with ESG and norms-based screens. In the event that exclusions cannot be verified through third-party data or if the Investment Adviser believes that third-party data and/or assessment is incomplete or inaccurate, the Investment Adviser reserves the right to identify business involvement activities through its own assessment (including by using other third-party data sources).
Exclusions for sovereign issuers are identified through the Investment Adviser’s proprietary research. The Investment Adviser leverages data from third-party institutions such as the United Nations and the World Bank to calculate ESG scores across the sovereign universe. Sovereign issuers are evaluated on: (1) a gross national income-adjusted basis to better understand how well a country manages ESG risk relative to its wealth and available resources, as well as (2) on an absolute basis. If the Investment Advisor believes that the third-party data and/or assessment is incomplete or inaccurate, the Investment Adviser reserves the right to identify exclusions for sovereign issuers through its own assessment.
Data quality and processing
Capital Group periodically reviews the performance quality of provider organizations and conducts ongoing monitoring and due diligence activities commensurate with the significance of the services provided.
Data are regularly updated in Capital Group’s internal platforms and made available to relevant teams. When issues are identified in third-party data, they are reported back to the provider(s). The Investment Adviser also applies systematic data quality checks to catch discrepancies and validate with the provider when issues arise.
Proportion of data that is estimated
Third-party providers may estimate data. While reported data are prioritized, Capital Group uses estimated data when reported data are unavailable. The proportion of estimated data varies depending on the data point due to inconsistencies in reporting by investee companies.

Limitations to methodologies and data

The methodology and sources relating to the exclusions and the ESG integration approach as a whole have certain limitations. In order to identify all publicly traded companies globally which are involved in activities such as the production of controversial products and revenue derived from activities that are inconsistent with the ESG and norms-based screens, the Fund uses data from third-party provider(s). In the event that data cannot be obtained through third-party providers or if the Investment Adviser believes that third-party data and/or assessment is incomplete or inaccurate, the Investment Adviser will aim to identify business involvement activities through its own assessment (including by using other third-party data sources).

Due diligence

Members of Capital Group's compliance, risk management and internal audit staff conduct periodic assessments on the design and operating effectiveness of the firm’s ESG activities and key controls. This includes compliance with internal processes and procedures as well as with the regulatory landscape in the jurisdictions in which the company operates. Capital Group meets regularly with the third-party data providers to review the quality of the services provided.
Pre-trade and post-trade checks are also in place as further explained in section “Monitoring of environmental or social characteristics” above.

Engagement policies

Establishing dialogue with companies is an integral part of the Investment Adviser’s investment management service to clients. Capital Group’s investment teams meet on a regular basis with company management, including executive and non-executive directors, chairs and finance directors. This enables the company to engage and generate dialogue on any issues that could affect the company’s long-term prospects, including exposures to sustainability issues.
Where Capital Group's investment teams identify an issue material to the long-term value of a company or they are concerned about relative ESG performance, Capital Group's investment professionals and governance teams will engage with management. Management’s response and the steps they take to minimise any associated risks, forms an important part of Capital Group's assessment of management quality, which itself is a key factor in the stock selection decisions.

Designated reference benchmark

The Fund has not designated a reference benchmark to meet the environmental and/or social characteristics it promotes.

Where can more product-specific information be found?

More product-specific information can be found in the pre-contractual template:
https://docs.publifund.com/1_PROSP/LU1577354035/en_LU
More product-specific information can be found in the periodic reports:
https://docs.publifund.com/4_AR/LU1577354035/en_LU