Senior Vice President, Head of Financial Conglomerate and RIA Distribution
Christine Benz
Director of Personal Finance, Morningstar
August 1, 2018
KEY TAKEAWAYS
The obsolence of pensions, inadequate saving rates and low interest rates are changing the math of retirement planning.
Portfolios must provide safety, income and capital appreciation in concert.
Consider a “three bucket” mindset to address the three demands on portfolios.
Advisors face a problem that’s very personal to Morningstar’s Christine Benz: the chase for yield.
Clients often seek income and advisors want to give it to them — potentially setting up a situation where yield trumps all else. Fortuntately, there’s a potential solution for advisors to consider.
Benz, Morningstar’s director of personal finance, saw this issue firsthand. She recalls how one of her retired relatives didn’t want to touch any of his invested principal. He was focused solely on yield — placing income above all other goals of a portfolio, including diversification and growth. He would often buy potentially risky bonds from individual issuers lured by yields alone, putting his overall plan at risk.
Benz, Morningstar’s director of personal finance, saw this issue firsthand. She recalls how one of her retired relatives didn’t want to touch any of his invested principal. He was focused solely on yield — placing income above all other goals of a portfolio, including diversification and growth. He would often buy potentially risky bonds from individual issuers lured by yields alone, putting his overall plan at risk.
“I got nervous thinking about his portfolio,” Benz told Capital Group at the Investments and Wealth Institute conference in Nashville. “He was very income-centric.”
Chasing income can cause investors to start “gravitating to their peril” toward assets that might have higher yields, but put the portfolio out of balance. It’s a risk more advisors will need a plan to deal with.
Factors fueling income chasing
Advisors may find clients eager to ignore calls for a diversified portfolio as they search for yield, due to three factors:
Interest rates remain historically low. Relatively low rates persist — although the yield on the 10-year Treasury briefly rose above 3% this year. Investors looking for higher levels of income have been pushed into riskier investments to compensate.
Yields have ticked up
But they’re still relatively low
Source: Thomson Reuters. As of 6/29/18.
Pensions are vanishing for many workers. The number of defined benefits plans in the U.S. fell to 45,672 in 2015, half the number that existed in 1975, according to data from the U.S. Department of Labor. Lacking a pension, many investors seek income from their defined contribution retirement accounts.
Investors aren’t saving enough. 401(k) account balances average $189,387 even among those closest to retirement — workers in their 60s with 20 to 30 years of work tenure, according to the EBRI/ICI Participant-Directed Retirement Plan Data Collection Project. “A 4% withdrawal rate from such a portfolio just isn’t going to cut it for most retirees,” Benz says.
Time for a new mindset: Three-bucket approach
Facing these challenges, advisors need to blend a strategy for income while still exposing portfolios to long-term growth, Benz says. “I have been a big believer in helping retirees get off this income-only mindset and think about it as cash flow.”
To make this happen, Benz suggests framing porfolios with three buckets — based on time frames. Not only does this help organize a portfolio to meet cash needs, but it’s also a way to explain the portfolio’s structure to clients. “It’s a nice way to back up and explain, ‘Here’s why I’m doing roughly what I’m doing,’” Benz says.
Bucket 1: Near-term needs. For very near-term expenses — those due in two years or less — this money needs to be left out of the investment portfolio. Cash or near-cash investments are best here.
The role it plays: Most clients should put enough cash in this bucket to cover a couple of years worth of portfolio withdrawals — after factoring in Social Security or possibly a pension for a baseline of income.
Consider a retiree who spends $60,000 annually, but who is earning $32,000 a year from Social Security. Holding $56,000, or two years of estimated portfolio withdrawals, in this bucket might be prudent, Benz says.
Older retirees who have near-term needs for income might be overweight in this bucket. But it’s not just older clients, younger clients planning to make a large purchase like a house in a few years should fill this bucket as well.
A side benefit: Adding this bucket to an allocation can also address the so-called sequence of returns risk. This is the risk of a poor market environment happening shortly after a client retires. If retirees sell investments at depressed levels early in their plan, that can increase their odds of running out of money. If they pull from this bucket instead — and keep invested money untouched — the results can be improved long term.
Bucket 2: Intermediate needs. For needs beyond the next two years, but less than 10, this bucket applies. This is a place for high-quality bonds.
The role it plays: This is an important bucket for new retirees who maintain low initital withdrawal rates. Use it to hold investments that should be ready for retirees as income needs increase.
Bucket 3: Long-term needs. This is where advisors can allocate the part of portfolios not needed for a decade or longer, Benz says. Advisors can focus on adding asset classes with track records of having generating returns needed to keep up with retirees’ long-term needs. It’s ideal for “primarily stocks, but maybe some lower quality, non-core fixed-income investments like high-yield bonds or emerging markets bonds,” she says. When considering high-yield or emerging markets bonds, investors should maintain a long-term perspective since these types of securities can fluctuate in price more than higher rated bonds.
The role it plays: This is the long-term growth engine for retirees, which supplants the need to chase risky investments with relatively high current yields. Selling investments in this bucket can refill bucket 1 when it is depleted.
Advisors can consider this approach to keep investors focused on the future and avoid chasing short-term ways to boost yield. “This idea of structuring a portfolio based on having a positive return over whatever our spending horizon is can be really powerful,” Benz says.
Video
Two Fathers: Two Approaches to Income
Eric Grey:
There's also a tension between kind of income or total return orientation, or some amalgam of the both. How do you think about that in today's environment?
Christine Benz:
Yeah. I, I really became engaged in this whole topic in working with my late father-in-law on his portfolio. He had a financial advisor uh, who he worked with, but he had always been of the mindset, which I think is common of, of people of his generation, where he wanted to live on his portfolio's yield alone. The principle was sac- sacrosancted, he never wanted to touch it. And so, he would come to me, and I remember sort of in the mid 2000's and say, "Well, there's this GM bond that I'm buying. What do you think about it? It happens to have the yield that I'm looking for."
And I got nervous thinking about his portfolio, he was very income centric. By contrast, my own dad had always been an individual stock investor and kind of a self-directed investor. He was used to selling things from his portfolio. So, the transition into retirement and using a total return approach in retirement was more comfortable for him. There was less of an educational curve that he had to climb in terms of embracing a total return approach in retirement.
So, I think, um, retirees actually can use a combination of an income-centric strategy and a total return approach so maybe they don't overly reach for income with their portfolios. They focus on portfolio that builds the best combination of risk/reward attributes. So, I have been a big believer in helping retirees get off this income-only mindset and think about it as cashflow. That in some years when the yield gods are really good, maybe your income from your portfolio will be sufficient. But in many other years, like the environment we're in right now, maybe selling appreciated parts of your portfolio is the way to go.
Eric Grey is head of financial conglomerate and RIA distribution for the North American Client Group at Capital Group, home of American Funds. He has 29 years of investment industry experience and has been with Capital Group for 20 years.
Investments are not FDIC-insured, nor are they deposits of or guaranteed by a bank or any other entity, so they may lose value.
Investors should carefully consider investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses.
This and other important information is contained in the fund prospectuses and summary prospectuses, which can be obtained from a financial professional and should be read carefully before investing.
Statements attributed to an individual represent the opinions of that individual as of the date published and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Capital Group or its affiliates. This information is intended to highlight issues and should not be considered advice, an endorsement or a recommendation.
All Capital Group trademarks mentioned are owned by The Capital Group Companies, Inc., an affiliated company or fund. All other company and product names mentioned are the property of their respective companies.
Use of this website is intended for U.S. residents only.
Capital Client Group, Inc.
This content, developed by Capital Group, home of American Funds, should not be used as a primary basis for investment decisions and is not intended to serve as impartial investment or fiduciary advice.
Use of this website is intended for U.S. residents only.