Capital IdeasTM

Investment insights from Capital Group

Categories
United States
US government debt: We need to talk
Darrell Spence
Economist

One question I’ve heard at virtually every client meeting over many years is, “Are you concerned that US government debt is too high?”


My somewhat glib, although honest, answer has always been: “It will become a problem when it becomes a problem.” That is, when foreign and domestic investors decide they no longer want to own US Treasury securities.


It’s difficult to know when that day will arrive, but it has become a problem for other countries when their debt levels grow to be larger than their gross domestic product (GDP). In the past when that occurred, if a country had interest rates that were higher than its economic growth rate, the incremental revenue generated by the economy each year became smaller than the interest payments on the debt, and the debt began to grow all by itself.


The US had been far from reaching that threshold. Until now.


The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates that next year, US government debt held by the public will exceed 100% of GDP and move rapidly higher in the ensuing decades. Worth noting is that the CBO forecast assumes that all legislation will be enacted as it is currently written — meaning that federal tax cuts passed in 2017 would expire. If that doesn’t happen, the numbers could go higher.


Total US debt exceeded $33 trillion as of 30 June, 2023. It’s one of the issues that nearly led to a government shutdown this month and could lead to another next month as Congress wrangles over budget priorities.


US government debt is projected to soar in the years ahead

Sources: Capital Group, Congressional Budget Office (CBO). CBO projections as of June 2023.

Will there instantly be problems when debt outstanding surpasses 100% of GDP? Probably not. Other countries have seen higher debt ratios without significant disruption. However, in some of those cases, the country had a unique dynamic that the US may not have, such as a large pool of domestic savings that made them less reliant on foreign investors to hold their debt.


Conversely, the US dollar is still the reserve currency of the world and is likely to remain so. All of this makes it difficult to predict when, or even if, debt might become a problem or to look to other countries’ experiences for guidance. Many countries throughout history have defaulted on their debt, but it was usually associated with a war or natural disaster.


That said, US debt dynamics are evolving in a way that requires attention. Over the next five years, net interest payments on the debt are expected to surpass defense spending. Over the next 10 years, those interest payments are projected to rise from $476 billion to $1.44 trillion. This means interest payments will consume an additional 10.6% of federal government revenue by 2033.


Interest payments on US government debt may soon surpass defence spending

Sources: Capital Group, Congressional Budget Office (CBO). CBO projections as of May 2023.

What are the consequences of too much debt?


Ever-rising debt levels may force the federal government to make tough policy choices, potentially impacting companies, industries and individual consumers. One obvious consequence would be structurally higher interest rates, as a greater supply of Treasury securities would lead to higher rates. Higher taxes might be required to meet debt service payments.


Slower economic growth also could be expected, given that government spending would need to be re-routed to debt service. For investors, this could lead to lower stock market returns over time, given the strong long-term correlation between GDP growth and market returns.


Not surprisingly, the debt question continues to be asked at client meetings. But it is now usually followed by a statement along the lines of: “The Federal Reserve cannot keep raising interest rates because doing so makes the government’s debt unaffordable.”


Keep in mind, the Fed is under no obligation to help the government afford its debt payments. The Fed’s mandate is to maintain full employment and stable prices. The only reason central bankers might consider making policy decisions with debt affordability in mind is if they saw it as a threat to achieving their mandate. And even then it would require some circuitous logic to link the two.


Debt levels have grown under every US president in the past 50 years

Capital Group, Bureau of the Fiscal Service, Congressional Budget Office. As of December 31, 2022.

A Congress that is unsatisfied with the Fed’s perceived lack of concern for the government’s fiscal position could change the Fed’s mandate or put it under their control. However, history suggests that the economies of countries whose central banks have lost independence do not often fare well.


None of this is meant to suggest that a US debt crisis is imminent or that the Fed is in danger of losing its independence. However, given how much the situation has deteriorated over such a short period of time, it is getting more difficult to argue that the debt doesn’t matter.


There are no easy solutions to solve the nation’s debt dilemma. But at $33 trillion and growing, policymakers will inevitably have to address the situation or deal with the market and economic repercussions in the not-too-distant future.



Darrell Spence covers the United States as an economist and has 31 years of investment industry experience (as of 12/31/2023). He holds a bachelor’s degree in economics from Occidental College. He also holds the Chartered Financial Analyst® designation and is a member of the National Association for Business Economics.


Our latest insights

RELATED INSIGHTS

Past results are not predictive of results in future periods. It is not possible to invest directly in an index, which is unmanaged. The value of investments and income from them can go down as well as up and you may lose some or all of your initial investment. This information is not intended to provide investment, tax or other advice, or to be a solicitation to buy or sell any securities.

Statements attributed to an individual represent the opinions of that individual as of the date published and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Capital Group or its affiliates. All information is as at the date indicated unless otherwise stated. Some information may have been obtained from third parties, and as such the reliability of that information is not guaranteed.

Capital Group manages equity assets through three investment groups. These groups make investment and proxy voting decisions independently. Fixed income investment professionals provide fixed income research and investment management across the Capital organization; however, for securities with equity characteristics, they act solely on behalf of one of the three equity investment groups.