Important information

The information contained in this website is intended strictly for sophisticated institutions.

The information contained in this website, does not constitute and should not be construed as an offer of, invitation or proposal to make an offer for, recommendation to apply for or an opinion or guidance on a financial product, service and/or strategy. Whilst great care has been taken to ensure  that  the  information  contained  in  this  website is  accurate,  no  responsibility  can  be accepted for any errors, mistakes or omissions or for any action taken in reliance thereon. You may only reproduce, circulate and use this website (or any part of it) with the consent of Capital International Management Company Sàrl (“CIMC”), 37A avenue J.F. Kennedy, L-1855 Luxembourg.

The information contained in this website is for information purposes only. It is not intended for and should not be distributed to, or relied upon by, members of the public.

The information contained in this website, may contain statements that are not purely historical in nature but are “forward-looking statements”. These include, amongst other things, projections, forecasts  or  estimates  of  income.  These  forward-looking  statements  are  based  upon  certain assumptions, some of which are described in other relevant documents or materials. If you do not understand the contents of this website, you should consult an authorised financial adviser.

Capital IdeasTM

Investment insights from Capital Group

Categories
Politics
Economic outlook: Global growth dependent on a resilient US
Rob Lovelace
Equity portfolio manager
Jared Franz
Economist
John Queen
Fixed Income Portfolio Manager

As inflation eases and central banks around the world cut interest rates, the outlook for the global economy remains decidedly mixed heading into the new year. Much like the past few years, the United States and India continue to lead the way, driving global economic activity, while weaker economies in Europe and China seek to stimulate growth.


With US labour markets healthy, profit growth solid and business investment picking up, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) recently raised its forecast for US economic growth in 2025 to 2.2%. That prediction offsets downward revisions for other advanced countries, including the largest economies in Europe. China, meanwhile, continues to struggle with a real estate downturn and worries about a broadening trade war following US President-elect Donald Trump’s victory on 5 November.


“I tend to think about the world in terms of tailwinds and headwinds,” says equity portfolio manager Rob Lovelace, “The US has plenty of tailwinds at the economic level, the industry level and the company level. Japan is picking up some tailwinds. And I think both Europe and China are dealing with some real headwinds at the moment.”


Healthy US economy remains a cornerstone of global growth


Displayed in a four-quadrant chart are the economic conditions of various countries and their impact on the global economy. There are two axes. The horizontal axis is labeled near-term headwinds at the far left and near-term tailwinds on the far right. The vertical axis is labeled long-term tailwinds at the top and long-term headwinds at the bottom. Circles to the top or bottom of the horizontal axis or to the left or right of the vertical axis represent countries. The United States, India and Japan are positioned for resilient growth and near-term tailwinds in the top right quadrant. In contrast, China is in the lower left quadrant indicating fragile growth and near-term headwinds. Canada and the United Kingdom fall between long-term headwinds and near-term tailwinds in the lower right quadrant, with the European Union straddling the line between long-term tailwinds and long-term headwinds near the center of the chart. Australia, Mexico and Brazil are all in the upper left quadrant signifying long-term tailwinds and near-term headwinds.

Sources: Capital Group. Country positions are forward-looking estimates by Capital Group economists as of November 2024 and include a mix of quantitative and qualitative characteristics (in USD). Long-term tailwinds and headwinds are based on structural factors such as debt, demographics and innovation. Near-term tailwinds and headwinds are based on cyclical factors such as labor, housing, spending, investment and financial stability. Circles represent individual economies. Circle sizes approximate the relative value of each economy and are used for illustrative purposes only.

Welcome to the Benjamin Button economy


Can US strength lift up the global economy and financial markets along with it? The world’s largest economy is striving to do just that.


Odd as it may sound, the US economy appears to be taking a page straight out of the 2008 movie The Curious Case of Benjamin Button. Film buffs will remember that the title character, played by Brad Pitt, ages in reverse, from old man to young child.


"The US economy is going through a similar transition,” says Capital Group economist Jared Franz. “Instead of moving through the typical four-stage business cycle that has defined the post-World War II era, the economy appears to be shifting from late-cycle back to mid-cycle, conveniently avoiding a recession.”


A mid-cycle economy is generally characterised by rising corporate profits, accelerating credit demand, softening cost pressures and a shift toward neutral monetary policy. “We’ve seen all four of those in 2024,” Franz notes. “I believe the US is headed for a multi-year expansion period, perhaps fending off a recession until 2028.”


The U.S. business cycle appears to be aging in reverse


A curved line graph charts a typical U.S. business cycle through economic growth, recovery, expansion and contraction. Below it are listed the four corresponding stages: early, mid, late and recession. Trends listed under each stage describe economic, employment and policy characteristics of the period. 2025 and 2024 are represented by circles on the curve.

Sources: Capital Group, MSCI. Positions within the business cycle are forward-looking estimates by Capital Group economists as of December 2023 (2024 bubble) and September 2024 (2025 bubble). The views of individual portfolio managers and analysts may differ. Returns data is monthly from December 1973 to August 2024. Data is Datastream US Total Market Index from 31 December 1973 through 31 December 1994, and MSCI USA data thereafter. Returns data reflects all completed cycle stages through 31 October 2024.

Historically speaking, mid-cycle periods have provided a favourable backdrop for US equities, generating returns averaging 14% a year. That is based on Capital Group analysis of economic cycles and returns dating back to 1973.


As always, it is important to acknowledge that past results are not predictive of results in future periods. “But if the US economy continues to grow at a healthy rate,” Franz says, “that could provide a healthy tailwind for markets."


Franz’s estimate for US economic growth is more optimistic than the IMF forecast. He expects the US economy to grow at an annualised rate of 2.5% to 3% in 2025, potentially higher if Trump is able to quickly cut taxes and slash government regulations, as he promised during his presidential campaign. Trump’s election, combined with a Republican sweep of the House and Senate, will likely translate into generally higher economic growth, Franz notes, but also higher inflation and higher interest rates than previously expected.


Outlook is mixed outside the US


In markets outside the United States, there is more divergence. Some bright spots, including India, are expected to lead the world, generating some of the fastest growth rates. India’s economy should enjoy 6.5% growth in 2025, according to IMF estimates, driven by a young and growing workforce. India also is benefiting from a post-pandemic shift in global supply chains, adding to its manufacturing base in mobile phones, home appliances and pharmaceuticals, among other products.


Europe’s economy continues to ride the edge between expansion and contraction, with expected growth around 1%, weighed down by the war in Ukraine, high energy prices and close ties to China’s sluggish economy. In response, the European Central Bank (ECB) started cutting interest rates this year ahead of the US Federal Reserve (Fed), hoping to kickstart the eurozone economy.


In China, meanwhile, the government has launched a massive stimulus program designed to reverse chronic weakness in the country’s real estate market and slowing industrial production. China’s growth-oriented policies include interest rate cuts, mortgage rate reductions, and a recently announced $1.4 trillion aid package to help local governments deal with growing debt burdens. Looking ahead, a cloud hangs over China’s role in international trade as the incoming Trump administration has vowed to raise tariffs on Chinese imports.


Where to invest in a rate-cutting cycle


Adding fuel to economic growth expectations, the world’s major central banks — the Fed, the ECB, the Bank of England and The People’s Bank of China — have all committed to monetary easing in the closing months of 2024.


The Fed, often considered the central bank to the world, has cut rates twice since September, setting the stage for what could be a favorable environment for financial markets in 2025. Rate cuts when the economy is growing have been a boon for investors in both stocks and bonds.


Of the Fed’s seven easing cycles since 1984, three occurred outside a recession. During those non-recessionary cycles, the S&P 500 Index averaged a 27.9% return from the first cut to the last, with most sectors posting double-digit gains.


Rate cuts have boosted stocks and bonds in a healthy economy


Two horizontal bar charts show the average annualized returns across the past seven Fed rate easing cycles on various investments during non-recessionary and recessionary cutting cycles. During non-recessionary cutting cycles U.S. stocks, as represented by the S&P 500 Index, returned 27.9%; international stocks, as represented by the MSCI World ex USA Index returned 27.5%; U.S. bonds, as represented by the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index returned 16.7%; and cash, as represented by 3-month U.S. Treasury Bills returned 6.2%. During recessionary cutting cycles returns were as follows: S&P 500 Index declined 3.5%; the MSCI World ex USA Index declined 9.4%; the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index returned 9.8%; and cash returned 3.7%. Average annual returns across all indexes are significantly lower (50% or more) during recessionary cutting cycles.

Sources: Capital Group, Bloomberg Index Services Ltd., Morningstar, Standard & Poor’s. Return calculations reflect annualized total returns over periods in which the U.S. Federal Reserve had stopped raising rates and began to actively cut rates, measured from the peak federal funds rate target to the lowest federal funds rate target for each cycle. Specific easing cycles included: August 1984 to August 1986 (non-recessionary), May 1989 to September 1992 (recessionary), February 1995 to January 1996 (non-recessionary), March 1997 to November 1998 (non-recessionary), May 2000 to June 2003 (recessionary), June 2006 to December 2008 (recessionary), and December 2018 to March 2020 (recessionary). Benchmarks used are the S&P 500 Index (U.S. stocks), MSCI World ex USA Index (international stocks), Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index (U.S. bonds) and the average investment rate of 3-month US Treasury Bills (cash). As of 30 September 2024.

During times when rate-cutting cycles have preceded a recession, stocks have not fared well. But bond returns have been strong in both non-recessionary and recessionary cutting cycles, significantly outpacing cash equivalent investments in non-recessionary periods.


John Queen, fixed income portfolio manager, believes the economy will continue to improve heading into the new year and thinks the Fed is simply looking to normalise interest rates, reducing them to a level where they are no longer restrictive. That was the base case before the US election, and it is even more so now.


“The Fed is cutting rates because it wants to,” Queen says, “not because it has to."



Rob Lovelace is an equity portfolio manager and chair of Capital International, Inc. He has 38 years of investment industry experience (as of 12/31/2023). He holds a bachelor’s degree in mineral economics from Princeton University. He also holds the Chartered Financial Analyst® designation.

Jared Franz is an economist with 18 years of investment industry experience (as of 12/31/2023). He holds a PhD in economics from the University of Illinois at Chicago and a bachelor’s degree in mathematics from Northwestern University.

John Queen is a fixed income portfolio manager with 34 years of investment industry experience (as of 12/31/2023). He holds a bachelor's degree in industrial management from Purdue.


Hear from our investment team.

Sign up now to get industry-leading insights and timely articles delivered to your inbox.

By providing your details you are agreeing to receive emails from Capital Group. All emails include an unsubscribe link and you may opt out at any time. For more information, please read the Capital Group Privacy Policy

Past results are not predictive of results in future periods. It is not possible to invest directly in an index, which is unmanaged. The value of investments and income from them can go down as well as up and you may lose some or all of your initial investment. This information is not intended to provide investment, tax or other advice, or to be a solicitation to buy or sell any securities.

Statements attributed to an individual represent the opinions of that individual as of the date published and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Capital Group or its affiliates. All information is as at the date indicated unless otherwise stated. Some information may have been obtained from third parties, and as such the reliability of that information is not guaranteed.

Capital Group manages equity assets through three investment groups. These groups make investment and proxy voting decisions independently. Fixed income investment professionals provide fixed income research and investment management across the Capital organization; however, for securities with equity characteristics, they act solely on behalf of one of the three equity investment groups.