Important information

This website is for Financial Intermediaries in Iceland only.

If you are an Individual Investor click here, if you are an Institutional Investor click here. Should you be looking for information for another location, please click here.

By clicking, you acknowledge that you have fully understood and accepted the Legal and Regulatory Information.

Capital IdeasTM

Investment insights from Capital Group

Categories
Global Equities
Stock market outlook: AI leads a broadening market
Julian Abdey
Equity Portfolio Manager
Mark L. Casey
Equity Portfolio Manager
Cheryl Frank
Equity Portfolio Manager

Clear tailwinds are gathering behind equity markets, providing an upbeat outlook for stocks in 2025.


The US economy remains strong, boosted by healthy labour markets, surging business investment and strong profit growth. The US Federal Reserve (Fed) and other major central banks have initiated an interest rate cutting cycle, providing an additional tailwind for financial assets.


Against this backdrop, markets enter 2025 amid a post-election rally in the US, as investors focus on business-friendly initiatives of the incoming Trump administration. And while advances in artificial intelligence continue to get most of the headlines, participation in the market rally has quietly broadened across industrials, utilities, health care and other sectors, as well as small-cap companies.


“Valuations generally are quite elevated,” says Julian Abdey, an equity portfolio manager. “So I’ve been trying to strike a balance in portfolios, looking for exposure to leading companies in well recognised areas like AI, but also seeking opportunities in less scrutinized areas of the market.”


A mix of opportunities and risks


Elevated valuations are not the only risk investors must consider in 2025. Sluggish economies in Europe and China could weigh on prospects for some companies, and ongoing conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East could agitate markets.


President-elect Trump’s priorities may include a mix of tailwinds and headwinds. On the plus side are proposals for tax cuts, increased defence spending and deregulation across a range of businesses, including banks, as well as energy, aerospace and health care companies.


“Trumponomics” could produce tailwinds and headwinds across the economy

A table outlines potential beneficiaries and laggards under the incoming Republican policy agenda. The column at left lists potential beneficiaries: deregulation beneficiaries, which include national and regional banks; energy and commodity exposed sectors, including oil and gas, steel, and coal; domestication of industry, which includes nonresidential and border construction, as well as onshoring infrastructure providers; domestic security; managed health care and cryptocurrency. The column at right lists potential laggards: companies at risk to tariffs, which include consumer and industrial companies with manufacturing bases abroad; renewables, which include clean electricity, battery storage, green hydrogen and energy efficiency; and companies at risk to wage pressure.

Source: Capital Group. As of 30 November 2024. Examples listed are for illustrative purposes only and do not represent investment recommendations.

Other Trump policies present challenges for certain industries. Plans for tariffs could trigger protracted trade conflicts with the country’s top trade partners — and potentially reignite inflation. The administration also will likely seek to roll back or dilute subsidies for renewable energy and electric vehicles. And deportations and immigration restrictions could potentially drive up labour costs, putting pressure on profit margins.


“There will be winners and losers, but many of these policy priorities are complex, and their impact is not always clear,” Abdey says. “The saying goes that ‘personnel are policy’, so the appointments will be critical in driving policy outcomes. In the meantime, I am focused on trends driving growth opportunity and identifying companies that can best take advantage of those opportunities, whether fast-growing tech businesses, old economy companies in cyclical sectors or traditional value sectors, like utilities.”


AI may be overhyped, yet bigger than you think


Excitement over the transformative potential of AI remains sky high, as does investment in the technology. Tech giants Amazon, Alphabet, Meta and Microsoft are expected to collectively spend $500 billion over the next three years in a race for dominance. The aggressive spending has been compared to excessive internet investments in the late 1990s amid questions about a possible AI pullback on the horizon.


The excitement and the concerns could both be valid. That is because we tend to overestimate mega trends in the short term while underestimating them over the longer term. Consider that early estimates for the size of personal computer, mobile phone, internet and cloud computing markets fell short by an average of 38%. Could AI market estimates fall even shorter?


“What is remarkable about AI is its broad potential utility,” says Mark Casey, an equity portfolio manager. “Because it can take on a multitude of human tasks, I consider the AI market to be unknowably massive.”


We tend to overestimate the short term and underestimate the longer term

The information graphic shows initial forecasts and actual numbers in four areas of technology. For the number of users of PCs and the internet as of February 1996, initial forecasts were for 225 million and 152 million, respectively. The actual numbers as of 2000 were 354 million for PC users and 361 million for internet users. These numbers represent an underestimation of users by 36% and 58%, respectively. For mobile phones, the initial forecast for smartphone shipments was 657 million in January 2010. By 2013, the number had climbed to 1,019 million. These numbers represent an underestimation in shipments of 36%. For the top three cloud providers the forecast revenue was $90.2 billion in March 2017. That figure rose to $115.6 billion by 2020. This represents an underestimation of revenue by 22%.

Source: Morgan Stanley AI Guidebook: Fourth Edition, 23 January 2024. Actual totals are as of 2000 for PC and internet users; 2013 for smartphone shipments; and 2020 for cloud provider revenue.

In the near-term, there will likely be overcapacity and excesses as enterprises experiment with AI to determine how to use it for competitive advantage. What’s more, there may not be enough power capacity, basic materials or capital equipment available for AI expansion to happen as quickly as many expect, says Cheryl Frank, an equity portfolio manager.


“I think there will be two AI cycles,” Frank says. “Now we are in the middle of an advertising-driven consumer AI cycle, and there will likely be a pullback. But the enterprise AI cycle will be a much longer and slower build.”


When and where will the multibillion-dollar AI spending spree pay off for investors?


The answer lies in the four-layer technology stack that enables AI workloads, as well as the supply chain needed for AI infrastructure. The AI stack includes semiconductors, cloud infrastructure, large language models such as Chat GPT, and applications for end users. Chipmakers like NVIDIA and ASML operate at one level while tech giants like Alphabet, Microsoft and Amazon seek to dominate multiple layers.


“There will be successful companies at each layer of the stack, and certain companies are trying to launch successful products at two or even three layers,” Casey says. “The question is, which companies will execute best — and which will stumble. That’s what I am focused on.”


But the new technology also relies on old economy resources, including copper, capital equipment and power. Soaring demand for these resources has been a boon for utility, industrial and mining companies. “The four so-called hyperscalers, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta and Microsoft, are spending about half of their capex budget on technology and half on buying land, constructing as many data centres as possible near reliable power and locking in long-term contracts with energy suppliers,” Casey says. “That should provide investment opportunity for years.”


Market gains have recently extended beyond tech

A horizontal bar chart compares cumulative total returns for the second half of 2024 as of November 30 for indexes representing small caps, value, dividends and growth, respectively. Total returns were as follows: representing small caps, the Russell 2000 Index, 19.5%; representing value, the Russell 1000 Value Index, 15.1%; representing dividends, the S&P 500 High Yield Dividends Aristocrats Index, 14.0%; and representing growth, the S&P 500 Index at 11.1% and the Russell 1000 Growth Index at 9.5%.

Sources: Capital Group, FactSet. As of 30 November 2024. Past results are not predictive of results in future periods.

Forgotten corners of stock market showing life


Indeed, the AI build-out, along with other major trends such as the rollout of electric vehicles and reshoring of manufacturing in the US, has provided significant opportunity for companies far beyond the tech sector. And that potential is being recognised. Market participation broadened beyond the tech sector in the second half of 2024, as dividend payers, value-oriented stocks and small caps all outpaced the broader S&P 500.


Conditions appear supportive for this broadening to continue, with the Fed easing monetary policy and the potential for more favorable regulations among banks, energy and health care companies, as well as likely increased defence spending under the incoming Trump administration. The US Commerce Department in November tapped global defense contractor BAE Systems to provide semiconductors used in jets and satellites, for example.


Less regulation and the potential for lower corporate tax rates could strengthen free cash flows for a range of dividend-paying companies, enabling them to boost payments. In addition, long-term trends such as the relocation of manufacturing to the US and AI data centre construction will boost electricity demand. For example, CenterPoint Energy is forecasting strong growth in 2025 due to booming demand for electricity and natural gas in Texas.


“I am looking for opportunities to invest in dividend payers that have been left behind by the market,” says Frank. “These include forgotten pharma, or drugmakers that don’t offer weight loss treatments, as well as utilities and select banks and defense companies.”


Big market trends extend opportunity to small caps


Several trends driving opportunity for the largest companies are also doing so among small-cap companies, or businesses with market capitalisations of roughly $6 billion or less. For example, Comfort Systems, a maker of heating and ventilation systems, and Modine Manufacturing, which builds cooling systems essential for data centers, have seen demand soar.


While mega-cap tech stocks dominated market returns over the last few years, small-cap companies have been trading near their cheapest valuations in more than 20 years relative to large companies.


“The valuation disconnect between small and larger stocks is one of the highest we’ve seen,” Abdey says. “There are a lot of innovative companies reasonably priced relative to larger companies associated with well-known market themes. I believe certain small caps are poised for a comeback.”


Capital spending super-cycle extends beyond US


The wave of trends laying the foundation for a capital spending super-cycle in the US is also driving opportunity for nimble European industrials.


Air travel is now above pre-COVID levels, driving demand for new commercial aircraft. Airbus, one of only two major manufacturers of planes globally, has a backlog of orders stretching out a decade.


France-based Schneider Electric, a leader in the industry, has posted double-digit sales growth for the third quarter of 2024 from global data center build-out, which is fueling demand for specialized equipment.


Within construction, a growing preference for durable materials that boost energy efficiency and lower costs has created opportunity for chemical makers, such as Switzerland’s Sika. Operating in a fragmented market, Sika is looking to gain market share by using size and scale to its advantage.


“These trends represent multi-decade investment opportunities, and we are only in the early innings,” says Lara Pellini, an equity portfolio manager. “Europe is home to industrial powerhouses solidifying their foothold in areas ripe for potential long-term global growth.”


European industrial titans are looking beyond Europe for opportunity

The chart shows the geographic revenue breakdown of six European companies. In each case, greater than half of each company’s revenue is generated from countries outside of Europe. In aerospace, French companies Airbus and Safran generate 60.7% and 57.0% of their revenue from markets outside of Europe, respectively. In electrical equipment providers, 72.1% of France's Schneider Electric revenue is derived outside Europe, while for Switzerland's ABB revenue from outside Europe is 64.1%. In building products, 69.4% of Swiss company Sika’s revenue is from non-European markets, while for Sweden's ASSA ABLOY the number is 67.9%.

Sources: Capital Group, FactSet. Revenue by region is estimated by FactSet based on most recently reported figures. As of 30 November 2024. Company examples cited are for illustrative purposes only and are not meant to be an investment recommendation.

Balance will be essential in the year ahead


There are clear reasons to be optimistic about equity investing in 2025. The artificial intelligence build-out, the advancement of life-changing medicines in the health care sector and a global capital investment super-cycle are just a few trends driving opportunity for well-run companies across the economy. There are, however, risks, including the lofty valuations of many stocks and the potential for disruptive trade conflicts.


The key for investors, says Frank, is to invest selectively with a long-term focus and maintain balance in portfolios. “I think it is important to stay fully invested, but I am pursuing diversification and trying not to be overexposed to any specific trend.”



Julian Abdey is an equity portfolio manager with 28 years of investment industry experience (as of 12/31/2023). He holds an MBA from Stanford and an undergraduate degree in economics from Cambridge University.

Mark L. Casey is an equity portfolio manager with 23 years of investment industry experience (as of 12/31/2023). He holds an MBA from Harvard and a bachelor’s degree from Yale.

Cheryl E. Frank is an equity portfolio manager with 26 years of investment industry experience (as of 12/31/2023). She holds an MBA from Stanford and a bachelor’s degree from Harvard.


Hear from our investment team.

Sign up now to get industry-leading insights and timely articles delivered to your inbox.

By providing your details you are agreeing to receive emails from Capital Group. All emails include an unsubscribe link and you may opt out at any time. For more information, please read the Capital Group Privacy Policy

Past results are not predictive of results in future periods. It is not possible to invest directly in an index, which is unmanaged. The value of investments and income from them can go down as well as up and you may lose some or all of your initial investment. This information is not intended to provide investment, tax or other advice, or to be a solicitation to buy or sell any securities.

Statements attributed to an individual represent the opinions of that individual as of the date published and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Capital Group or its affiliates. All information is as at the date indicated unless otherwise stated. Some information may have been obtained from third parties, and as such the reliability of that information is not guaranteed.

Capital Group manages equity assets through three investment groups. These groups make investment and proxy voting decisions independently. Fixed income investment professionals provide fixed income research and investment management across the Capital organization; however, for securities with equity characteristics, they act solely on behalf of one of the three equity investment groups.